I can think of no superior example thoroughly demonstrating why the Bible is not the holy word of any deity than the tale of Noah and his ark.Although this book is intended to be a short introduction of biblical problems for those still hanging onto their programmed beliefs, Im unable to fathom how I can be concise with the tale of the global flood.This indisputably necessary consequence of his actions should ironically put a huge kink in the pro-life arguments from the church.
- christian online dating in australia
- sext koleksi org tua melayu
- Amerikanische singles kaiserslautern
- who is selena dating 2016
- how to run a successful dating site
Because several additional minor parallels exist, I would encourage everyone to read Tablet XI of the short epic in its entirety in order to appreciate fully the similarities between the two legends.
Since the Gilgamesh tale is the earlier version of the two, we can only surmise that the authors of Genesis copied the Epic of Gilgamesh or inadvertently patterned the story of Noahs ark on an even more ancient flood legend that we have yet to discover.
Within the story, we have a god who has to modify virtually all of his creations for the solely expressed reason of the people having become wicked and evil (Genesis 6:5), yet wicked and evil people continue to exist throughout the Bible.
Right off the bat, the foundation for the story fails to make sense.
While many people claim they have evidence for the ark being conveniently underground, no one has ventured to exhume it from the earth.
Genesis, the only known source of Noahs story, has several hundred additional problems in need of answers before we can consider it a reliable historical source.
One might even ask if they bothered to proofread their work.
Such casual observations work well against the hypothesis of an all-knowing god, a consideration well revisit repeatedly.
All evidence presented as proof of the arks discovery has been admitted to be a hoax, proven a hoax, or withheld from testing.